Enum: better styling

[pirj]

We suggest the kwargs-style enum definition:

  enum type: {
    credit: 0,
    debit: 1
  }

This is problematic in two ways.

1. Passing options like prefix/suffix/scopes/default is complicated (needs to be prefixed with an underscore) and is not documented
2. Results in weird unrelated errors (mentions the very first defined enum instead of the one that has options)

Ok to change this to use positional args for name and values?

  enum :type, {
    credit: 0,
    debit: 1
  }

With options:

  enum :type, {
    credit: 0,
    debit: 1
  }, suffix: true

[Earlopain]

Not sure if you're aware, but there's a cop for this now: rubocop/rubocop-rails#1336
It is only is for Ruby >= 3.0 because on 2.7 it can cause keyword argument warnings (rubocop/rubocop-rails#1363). The new syntax itself was introduced with Rails 7.0

[pirj]

@koic @andyw8 wdyt?

[pirj]

Off-topic: Rails 6.1 is EOL a month ago, is it a good idea to scrub the guide from legacy content, and leave a note that pre-7 guidelines are only kept in the GitHub repo (in a branch).?